Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: Does the Delorme InReach Explorer satisfy the Comm reqs for Transpac?

  1. #11
    pogen's Avatar
    pogen is offline Sailing canoe "Kūʻaupaʻa"
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    927

    Default

    A rule of thumb widely applied is if you pay for it, it is not allowed, even if it is just repackaged NOAA data. They are still doing work for you preparing a targeted report, and saving you effort.

    Saildocs works really well, is free, and covers pretty much all the NOAA products. You can also set up a subscription so that various reports and GRIBS are mailed to you every day or twice a day or whatever.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    37.205346,-121.963398
    Posts
    788

    Default Ocens - check on possibilities

    I have sent a query to Ocens to see what they provide exactly. It appears that their data download is not massaged but that they provide applications for PC's/Macs that do weather display and massaging of the data. That would be no different than a program like Expedition or some types of GRIB viewers. I have asked for a specific explanation of the data as well as if they would have an interest in a fleet deal.

    This is really a grey area. One could argue that requesting data from a specific region via an email service constitutes data massaging. Sailmail comes to mind, you pay for that after all.

    I believe the Mini Transat limits weather data to what can only be copied off an SSB receiver. All the boats carry a small SSB rcvr and spend some time during the day getting weather information. Maybe someone on here has better insight into those requirements ?

    Brian

    Quote Originally Posted by pogen View Post
    A rule of thumb widely applied is if you pay for it, it is not allowed, even if it is just repackaged NOAA data. They are still doing work for you preparing a targeted report, and saving you effort.

    Saildocs works really well, is free, and covers pretty much all the NOAA products. You can also set up a subscription so that various reports and GRIBS are mailed to you every day or twice a day or whatever.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    86

    Default

    http://www.ocens.com/SpotCast-Weathe...px#Description

    It doesn't look as though there is any interpretation. I was planning on using this and a SSB receiver.

  4. #14
    pogen's Avatar
    pogen is offline Sailing canoe "Kūʻaupaʻa"
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    927

    Default

    The SailMail service is paid for as it provides internet connectivity and email hosting via SSB, but no data. This is the same as your basic satphone rental or DeLorme rental. So, not information, just a means for getting information.

    SailDocs is a free service that can be accessed from SailMail or any other email means, and sends only NOAA data such as GRIBS and text forecasts. All this is allowable information.

    For DeLorme, it is a mixed bag, there are a number of services available. SpotCast by OCENS on DeLorme seems to only provide the NWS data, localized to your present position as determined by the DeLorme itself.

    http://www.ocens.com/SpotCast-Weather-P526.aspx

    I would guess that this is probably OK. There are other services from DeLorme, like weather predictions from Forecast.io, which is a third-party provider, and a whole bunch of value-add products from OCENS that are almost certainly not OK.

    As far as SSB wx goes, all the forecasts and weatherfaxes available are listed here,

    http://weather.noaa.gov/fax/ptreyes.shtml

    and there are a lot of text reports like this

    http://weather.noaa.gov/pub/data/raw...tr.cwf.mtr.txt

    And whether one gets the data via SSB ( 4 - 12 MHz technology ) or satellite ( 1.6 GHz technology) can be left up to the skipper.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Discovery Bay, CA
    Posts
    496

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bizirka View Post
    http://www.ocens.com/SpotCast-Weathe...px#Description

    It doesn't look as though there is any interpretation. I was planning on using this and a SSB receiver.
    This is exactly the report I used for the Long Pac. I assumed it was permissible because it did not involve routing it simply provided conditions albeit localized conditions to some unknown extent.

    We could probably start a lengthy legal debate re "paying" for services. Heck, I have to pay for the equipment to receive the broadcasts. Some competitors may be able to afford a much better rig than mine in order to reliably obtain broadcasts or other "freely available" data. So if you were to tell me everyone may only have specific equipment and obtain data from a specific place, while I don't like it, I accept it. Otherwise I think the general rule outlawing routing data or specially massaged helper data is, perhaps, the fairest way to go.

    No way I am trying to start that lengthy debate!!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    228

    Default

    At what point does the race committee and the participants begin to talk about amending the long-standing rules of not receiving any outside assistance? it seems that at the time that rule was written, it was very valid, though now it seems not so much...

    When that rule was likely written, having a shore based router - let alone a way of communicating with that shore based router - would have been a distinctive advantage over the average Corinthian amateur, though very expensive. Disallowing outside assistance was a way to even the playing field.

    Now, in the day and age of 2015, it's a distinct advantage - based on the rules of no outside assistance - to have a broadband receiver and dedicated computer running complex routing software such as Adrena or Expedition. If you don't have that equipment, you're at a clearly definable disadvantage. One way to even the playing field, from a weather and routing standpoint, would be to allow your homie to give you some advice over the (sat) phone, or via a text message to your Delorme FOR FREE. Technically, this would make outside assistance the very CHEAPEST way of receiving weather data. I can recall two Singlehanded Transpacs where I had little or no weather data at times, but had a functioning sat phone and had to resist every temptation to "cheat" and ask my friend for advice. I can't imagine everyone resists that urge, all the time, every time. When I was on the Moore 24, I was literally hand-steering blind with no weather data - probably not very safe - but had a working sat phone. That is stupid.

    Commanders Weather will route you brilliantly to Hawaii for a couple of hundred bucks, and will package daily data and routing advice, based on your polars. Combine that expense with a sat phone or a Delorme and professional shore-based routers are now cheaper (and arguably infinitely better) than any old school solution such as an SSB. I'm sure someone could make the argument that someone could up the game and get Marcel van Triest or Stan Honey to route them from shore at great personal expense, but honestly, if that's the make-or-break in the whole equation, you should be record-setting in maxi-trimaran's, not racing solo to Hawaii in 40-year old production monohulls.

    Let's stop kidding ourselves that we're avoiding an arms race within the SHTP by disallowing outside support and discouraging (through monetary fee) outside sponsorship, local industry support, etc.

    Just my 2 cents
    Last edited by ronnie simpson; 11-23-2015 at 12:02 AM.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    92

    Default

    I agree with Ronnie. I distinctly remember when Loran A became available in the 70's for yacht racers. It for the first time took yacht navigation to a different level. Prior to that, yacht racing navigation was 99 percent dead reckoning and ADF, with celestial navigation really only being used in races across the gulf of mexico to an island near cancun. Finding a shamen or witch doctor who could do celestial was difficult, and I learned enough of it to do it from the then equivalent of "celestial navigation for dummies" written by Mary Blewitt. Electronic navigation, with its precise accuracy, has certainly leveled the playing field, because we all know where we are now, safely, reliably and accurately, to an extent unimaginable not that long ago. I cant imagine flying my airplane without GPS, or sailing my boat without it. In the beginning, it was very expensive, and a lot of us could not afford it. Personally, I was against its use, as I felt, (and still do) that its use takes away from an essential sailor's skill that should be preserved, and for many years special trophies were given for racers who only used celestial. Not so much now.
    My point is technology and time change reality. Todays reality is that we have equipment available to all, and it clearly makes far safer landfalls, and is overall a much safer environment when we all know exactly where we are. I think we should be able to use a service like iridium go, predict wind, which provides a program for optimal departure, and a routing program that gives you a fastest and most comfortable option for routing. This is a safety factor also (comfort means less heavy weather from the wrong direction in this case). It seems to me that some routing should be permitted. The iridium system gives you the same thing that expedition does as I understand it, but would be illegal now, i.e., grib files with current that it runs through a model and then sends out to subscribers. It basically gives you (I think) what grib files with expedition gives you, an optimal route for the predicted conditions. I am very much opposed to a system where we allow Stan Honey, or whoever, to direct or advise us, as it somehow seems that it isnt a single-handed race anymore. It becomes kind of like singlehanded, with a virtual crewmember, without having to feed him (except with money?) To summarize, I am for allowing digitizd weather and routing avialable by subscription to all, which is formulated by algorithims (sp?) as opposed to the same information which is then interpreted by a guru who may not be available to all.
    Jim

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,688

    Default

    In response to Ronnie and Jim (sorry Jiri), there's a big difference between the skipper receiving weather information (he then has to interpret) and the skipper receiving routing advice: "When you reach <lat> <lon> turn 10 degrees to port." The skipper's ability to interpret the weather is the big variable in a solo Hawaii race. If you cheat and call someone for routing advice during the race you're a cheater and might as well stay home.

    If the DeLorme gadget will be required and it supplies NOAA data in some other form, it seems that receiving that data should be okay since everyone is receiving the same thing - just add it to the list of acceptable data. That's still different from calling Stan during the race and asking him when you should turn south. (From what I know of Stan he won't tell you anyway.)

    We paid the big bucks before last year's Pacific Cup and bought a routing package from "one of the best." Because of rapid changes in the forecast right after the start, it was worse than useless. I did wonder how some of our competitors appeared to know about the changes so quickly, and we didn't.
    Last edited by BobJ; 11-23-2015 at 11:54 AM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Perhaps this isn't necessary - but, to be clear I started this thread to find the most affordable way (trying to avoid satphone/SSB) to stay within the rules NOT get around them.

    I was hoping that the standard 'transat mini issued' SSB receiver (by the way is there anything better than the 10+ year old Sony ICF-SW7600GR) would satisfy the weather receiving portion of the rule and the delorme would satisfy the the position reporting and act as a backup for receiving weather.

    Perhaps I am not following correctly, but I gather that the delorme weather provides a 'single grib' at a specific location (either current or a selected lat/lon).

    I appreciate peoples expertise here!

  10. #20
    pogen's Avatar
    pogen is offline Sailing canoe "Kūʻaupaʻa"
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronnie simpson View Post

    Let's stop kidding ourselves that we're avoiding an arms race within the SHTP by disallowing outside support and discouraging (through monetary fee) outside sponsorship, local industry support, etc.

    Just my 2 cents
    Well, don't look to see shoreside services like Commander's to be allowed. I think the DeLorme/Spotcast is probably fair game, as it is just providing a snapshot from an NWS forecast.

    I also don't at all understand how we are "discouraging.. sponsors" with a fee. The whole point of sponsors is they contribute financially, or in kind, or else they are not sponsors.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •