Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43

Thread: Alameda Marina Development

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    609

    Default

    They're also rigid about beam - yours and mine are too wide to store in the parking area
    Wow, so not a single dry storage option for me in the future.....

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,688

    Default

    Go tonight and state your case. Maybe they'll change out one of the smaller hoists near the harbormaster's office and provide more storage area. If they got rid of all the RV's (which have many other storage options) they might be able to accommodate just the boats.

    One of the reasons I put my boat back in the water was the no-options concern. A couple times the big hoist was acting up and I almost missed races.
    Last edited by BobJ; 11-18-2015 at 11:05 AM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    2,095

    Default

    I actually looked into what a 3-ton, freestanding, 180-degree turning jib crane costs and the answer is about $5-6K. Then you add in the actual hoist, 3-ton, electric, three phase (420 volt) with a 20 foot drop which is about $4200. Of course you have to buy a mess of big bolts and some steel bar to anchor the thing in a substantial concrete foundation. Now throw in about $1,000 shipping.

    I guesstimate that the all-up cost of all the "stuff" to put in a freestanding, functional 3 ton boat hoist is about $12,000 +/- " a lot". Then you have to pay to get it certified by the County, and I have no idea what that costs.

    That's a lot of money but it's not a completely stupid and ridiculous amount of money. It's possible that another Marina would consider doing it if they knew for drop-dead certain that they'd have 20 boats paying $100 a month for dry storage and access to the hoist.

    20 boats X $100/month X 12 months = $24,000

    So the hoist would pay for itself in about 6 months. If you figure that it costs $10K in labor to put the thing in, and paying for the permits with the City and County, then in a year, it would be making a profit.

    Of course there's maintenance. The thing to do is to get a 180 degree hoist, based on a "wall hoist" model, but mounted on a free mast. If the arm is manually moved by a winch and cable you don't have to deal with the extremely expensive and finicky electric motors and conducting surfaces that the Alameda 2 and 3 ton hoists have.

    I think the issue would be finding a more-or-less Central Bay marina with the parking and storage space available. Municipal Marinas have to deal with so much bureuocracy that it's probably not worth it. That means private marinas' I had in mind Ballena Bay, because they actually do have a parking area that would probably hold 100 boats and trailers, but I hear that the marina is kind of a dump, now.
    1968 Selmer Series 9 B-flat and A clarinets
    1962 Buesher "Aristocrat" tenor saxophone
    Piper One Design 24, Hull #35; "Alpha"

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    2,095

    Default

    The other thing that occurred to me was that maybe the City of Alameda would go for putting in a hoist somewhere on Alameda Point...maybe near the Encinal boat ramp. There's acres and acres of parking there, already. BTW, the Encinal Boat ramp is over by the Hornet. There used to be another boat ramp over there and some slips, maybe about 20. Satellite views show that there's still a floating dock, but it's not connected to the land by a ramp any more.

    Also, the developer might be convinced that it's worth his while ... and $20,000.... to put in a big hoist somewhere nearby to get the boaters off his back.
    Last edited by AlanH; 11-18-2015 at 12:43 PM.
    1968 Selmer Series 9 B-flat and A clarinets
    1962 Buesher "Aristocrat" tenor saxophone
    Piper One Design 24, Hull #35; "Alpha"

  5. #15
    pogen's Avatar
    pogen is offline Sailing canoe "Kūʻaupaʻa"
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    927

    Default

    The new owners of the condos they are likely to build are probably going to want more parking spaces for their own cars than boat parking. Or just throw up a few more condos and go with the zone legal minimum of spaces per sq ft of residential space...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,688

    Default

    Yes, developers beg and plead for the absolute minimum parking spaces the city will allow, then they build tiny ones.

    I'm pretty serious about this self-use hoist business idea. It keeps sailing (more) affordable, it's green (no bottom paint, diver cleanings, etc.) and it targets the size of boats we tend to have. The 2-ton hoist market is served pretty well around here; the need is for one notch up from that, but still self-use.

    Let's keep talking about it.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    2,095

    Default

    COPIED from Pressure Drop:

    Hi, there were two meetings today at the Marina. I went to the Community meeting this evening, but heard from two tenants of the marina about how the noontime "tenants" meeting went. Both of the business tenants said that the community meeting was quite "friendly" whereas the business tenants met with the actual president of the development company. Word from the two guys I talked to was that the developer told them he's coming in with cranes, wrecking balls and bulldozers in 18-24 months and they all have to be out.

    So worst case, there's the timeline.

    He apparently told everybody that he had no choice, the City zoning specified that the site HAD to be "mixed use" housing. Apparently the tenor of the meeting....and remember, I wasn't there, I'm just passing this on secondhand....was along the lines of "I own the place, I'm flattening it, I don't have a choice, get the fuck out." More about zoning later.

    The "Community Meeting" at 7:00 was very different. A panel from the development company plus a woman who served as "moderator"....probably works for the company... tried to make the point that this was the very first discussion about what the community wanted. There was a lot of talk about "waterfront access", the Bay Trail, parking and public transit, and laughably... "honoring the heritage of the site". They then went on to present us all with a series of photographs/powerpoint slides of the proposed site layout.

    I want to be crystal-clear about this. There is NO provision. None. Zero for any marine industry on the site. OK, maybe a kayak retailer. MAYBE...maybe...a sail loft. Maybe. But dry storage? No. Metalwork? No. Hoists? No. Haulout facilities of any kind? No. The picture on their website was not presented to us. I REPEAT, the site layouts shown us had NO marine industry on the site, it was entirely housing and "mixed retail".


    It's clear that they want to save the boat slips because they're picturesque. They will probably upgrade them.

    The team presented us with four or five 'optional" layouts of the site to choose from. I think I can say without exaggeration that I and everybody else was shocked. All of the layouts differed only in where the "townhouses" were placed (around the inlet by the 3 ton hoist) and where the high-density apartments were placed. --Or was it single-family homes? It's ALL going to be housing. The streets that come down to Blanding will be extended into the boatyard with little welcoming arches over them so that the community feels welcome. There will be little 40 x 40 mini-parks between the condo clusters that qualify as "open space". The Bay Trail will be extended through the area.....never mind that it stops dead at the south end of the facility because the Naval Reserve site is there.

    That's their vision. Their questionnaire "did we strongly agree, slightly agree, strongly disagree...etc. etc" with the various pictures they put up showed a massive, fundamental disconnect between the academic "urban planner" mindset, and actual reality. I think you all would be horrified if you saw what they were proposing. In all cases at least 75-80% of the attending people "Strongly Disagreed" with the appropriateness of ALL the housing pictures they showed us. ALL of them. Without fail.

    A lot of local people spoke out about traffic issues. It was pointed out that 5,000 more homes were going in at Alameda Point. There are other developments going on as well. I hear that traffic in the Posey Tube is absolutely insane for a two-plus hour period during every rush hour.

    At any rate, two things became obvious:

    1. the developing companies "team" that came to the community meeting is the velvet glove around the iron hand. They were there to acquaint people with what they believe WILL go in, and to make us feel that the community has a hand in the decision process. We don't, but they want to make us feel like that. Well...that's their job. I think they failed.

    2. There's a serious, enormous, grossly obvious disconnect between the developers staff and their "vision" of practically everything, and what the community and marina people at the meeting want to see. One look at the urban planning buzzword orgy on the developers website should show that.

    Finally... what to do about it?
    Last edited by AlanH; 11-19-2015 at 01:19 AM.
    1968 Selmer Series 9 B-flat and A clarinets
    1962 Buesher "Aristocrat" tenor saxophone
    Piper One Design 24, Hull #35; "Alpha"

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    2,095

    Default

    Finally... what to do about it?

    What's apparently driving the housing issue is zoning. In 2012 the whole north shore of Alameda and Alameda Point was rezoned for "mixed use housing". You can't have "light industry"...meaning boatyards and metalworking shops in "Mixed use housing". At least, that's what we were told. You CAN have "light retail"...starbucks, for example. And a couple of tony waterfront restaurants.

    Well, the developer has only one thing on his mind....Make Money. He can make money by razing all of the Alameda Marina and replacing it with "mixed use housing" and "light retail". What's driving this is zoning. ZONING.

    The former vice-mayor of the City of Alameda was there. He pointed out that the PR committee for the development company had quietly neglected to tell us that SOME of the property at the Alameda Marina is actually OWNED BY THE CITY. He also pointed out to all of us that Zoning laws and regulations are not handed down by Zeus from the mountaintop. They can be changed. So it became obvious that the way to get this stopped is not to go to the developer, but instead, go to the Planning Commission, Planning office and City Council for the City of Alameda.

    The developer could give a shit about the Marina or the place it occupies in the boating community. He's there to Make Money. He will Make A Shitload Of Money if he replaces the admittedly funky Alameda Marina with another cookie-cutter set of apartments and townhomes planned by some architecture wonks. However, he can make a slightly Smaller Shitload of Money by doing a big redesign of the Marina, consolidating but not removing services, kicking out the RV storage and adding some buildings.

    But he's not going to do that UNLESS THE ZONING FORCES HIM TO.

    So friends, if you don't want to see the Alameda Marina bite the dust, you need to tell the City of Alameda what you think...loudly, and often. And RIGHT NOW. Apathy, giving up and rolling over will get you nothing but a townhouse development that you can't afford to buy into.

    Alan
    1968 Selmer Series 9 B-flat and A clarinets
    1962 Buesher "Aristocrat" tenor saxophone
    Piper One Design 24, Hull #35; "Alpha"

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    2,095

    Default

    The guys from the development company appeared to be somewhat taken aback by the intensity of the objections, but I'm cynical and I suspect it was all an act. The woman who served as moderator did her job well...kudos to her for moderating the meeting, but it's obvious that she's employed by the development company. She too, could give a shit about the marina or its services.

    I think that they accidentally let slip that zoning was driving the process to be specifically ALL housing. Then again, that might have been an act. Whether it's an act or not, the truth is that if the City changes the zoning....which they might not be able to do, the Developer might sue the City if they do that....but if they do it, then the Way To Make Shitloads Of Money would change, and that's what we want.
    1968 Selmer Series 9 B-flat and A clarinets
    1962 Buesher "Aristocrat" tenor saxophone
    Piper One Design 24, Hull #35; "Alpha"

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    2,095

    Default

    There is a POSSIBILITY....the woman from the company brought it up with me several times .. that maybe a bunch of the services that the Alameda Marina offers could be moved elsewhere.

    She's clueless of course, it's just her "company line" she has NO idea what she's talking about...no clue what's required, and completely ignoring the permitting process....

    But it HAS occurred to me that a "Hoist and Store" business at Alameda Point might work. There would have to be a contract with the City, and a long-term lease, and those aren't so easy to pull off. You'd also have to get permits from the BCDC to fill part of the shoreline to make a seawall appropriate for a hoist launch, at least in the area I'm thinking of.
    1968 Selmer Series 9 B-flat and A clarinets
    1962 Buesher "Aristocrat" tenor saxophone
    Piper One Design 24, Hull #35; "Alpha"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •