Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 46

Thread: windvanes

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    San Francisco Bay
    Posts
    156

    Default

    I haven't used this but have read that a small electric tiller pilot can be adapted to a wind vane servopendulum self steering system (like the Monitor or ...) to steer to a compass bearing and is touted to be an inexpensive and reliable method for downwind steering.

    See, for example: http://www.selfsteer.com/products/monitor/autoPilot.php

    This idea uses the tiller pilot to replace the wind vane and requires very little force or power from the tiller pilot.

    I would be interested to hear people's experience with this.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    228

    Default

    good explanation of a servo-pendulum gear by the general. he certainly has sailed enough miles to get a good grasp of how they work!

    the gerneral is right jackie, there is no reason at all to strengthen your transom to add a Navik. my 2-27 yachted it's way from CA to new zealand and it's transom is stock.

    smokester, SHTP vet brian boschma has been messing with and pioneering systems like you speak of, for years. figure out a way to get in touch with him and he can likely help steer you in the right direction, lame pun fully intended.

    cheers.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Santa Barbara Sometimes
    Posts
    167

    Default

    Some of Brian's ideas and products are described at

    http://validator.stacieboschma.com/products/

    One of the videos shows a small actuator motor linked to the Atoms wind vane on Frolic (Islander 36). It worked really well - used it when we motored during the trip back to CA last summer.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    San Francisco Bay
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronnie simpson View Post
    ...smokester, SHTP vet brian boschma has been messing with and pioneering systems like you speak of, for years. figure out a way to get in touch with him and he can likely help steer you in the right direction, lame pun fully intended.

    cheers.
    Quote Originally Posted by hodgmo View Post
    Some of Brian's ideas and products are described at

    http://validator.stacieboschma.com/products/

    One of the videos shows a small actuator motor linked to the Atoms wind vane on Frolic (Islander 36). It worked really well - used it when we motored during the trip back to CA last summer.
    Thank you for steering me in the right direction.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Not that this will help all that much, but i have been using the same Hasler SP vane for over 35 years on three different boats. It is a horizontal pivot, so it is not quite a efficient as a vertical, but it is only about 20 lbs, works delightfully, and has proved to be very durable. I replaced the Micarta with Delrin parts for the Transpac, and I have hooked it to a small traveler that is in turn attached to a ST2000 for light air and down wind work. Wear and tear on the ST2000 is near nil as it only has to change the servo blade angle, the blade provides the power to tiller.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by sdpaine@cox.net; 02-13-2015 at 08:19 PM.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdpaine@cox.net View Post
    Not that this will help all that much, but i have been using the same Hasler SP vane for over 35 years on three different boats. It is a horizontal pivot, so it is not quite a efficient as a vertical, but it is only about 20 lbs, works delightfully, and has proved to be very durable. I replaced the Micarta with Delrin parts for the Transpac, and I have hooked it to a small traveler that is in turn attached to a ST2000 for light air and down wind work. Wear and tear on the ST2000 is near nil as it only has to change the servo blade angle, the blade provides the power to tiller.
    That should be a museum piece when the boat is retired.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    San Francisco Bay
    Posts
    156

    Default

    To take advantage of the vast experience here, I am wondering if there is a VMG penalty using a windvane. What little data I have seen--albeit somewhat dated--indicates that they average slightly better than an autopilot except on a beam reach where the data show they are roughly equal.

    I have heard anecdotally that the drag and responsiveness of a windvane can produce significant performance penalties for racing. It surely must make a difference as to the type of windvane and boat, sail plan and point-of-sail. My boat is a Pacific Seacraft 37 which is fairly heavy and has a modified fin keel and skeg-hung rudder. Watching the windvane at work never ceases to mesmerize me so I would hate to think I would need to ditch it in favor of an autopilot.

    But autopilots have become very sophisticated, sailing to the apparent or true wind, and using motion sensors and adaptive learning to account for boat motion. There is also the hybrid brian boschma.com approach mention below which greatly reduces the power consumption and noise of electrically-powered rudder control.

    Most modern sss folk seem to be racing with autopilots...Why is that?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    235

    Default

    Smokester
    Take a look at my previous post on this subject (#20). The singlehanded transpac is pretty much a downwind race after you get into the NE trades (400 or so miles out of the gate. That's when the chutes go up to take advantage of winds over your shoulder from behind. Withe chute up, my fin-keel, spade rudder boat will often surf up to 10 or 12 knots from a steady state speed of 6 kts. That's when the apparent wind shifts forward and the vane, which only sees apparent wind, thinks the boat has gone off course. It tries to correct the heading, but that's not what we want at that stage. So the vane users usually end up with a course of "S" turns, travelling farther that if they were to maintain their selected heading. My auto pilot can operate using the masthead wind sensor, but there is a delay in the system which defeats the forward movement of the apparent wind...usually. Or it can operate on a compass course just as easily, but that requires me to be watchful of wind shifts requiring sail trimming.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Honolulu
    Posts
    228

    Default

    smokester, Harrier is exactly right, couldn't have described the differences better myself. Another thing to think about is the drag in the water of the wind vane rudder/ paddle. On a PSC 37 this may be pretty minimal, but even .1 knots of boat speed adds up to about 40 miles over the course of 16-18 days or so, which is your likely pace. at 6 knots VMG, you're looking at 7 hours, just assuming .1 knot difference which is conservative. when i sailed the race in 2012, the top 5 boats in my division corrected out within 12 hours... 7 hours would have dropped me from first to fourth in class. something to think about if placing well in the race is a priority for you.

    wind vanes are absolutely phenomenal from a power conservation/ reliability standpoint and on my recent cruise to New Zealand, the wind vane was the single biggest 'enabler' in allowing me to complete long solo journeys... from a racing/ performance stand point however, a good modern electric AP will reign superior. assuming you have the $$$ to purchase and power budget to run the AP, but that's two entirely different conversations. in a perfect world, a boat like yours would likely have a solid AP and a wind vane for back up/ cruising/ delivery home. sort of like sat phone vs ssb. in the sense of an SHTP, it's often best to have both if resources allow.

    ps - sailing downwind in light air with a wind vane blows, and youre likely to see those conditions on a transpac...

    good luck mate
    Last edited by ronnie simpson; 02-17-2015 at 06:17 PM.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Respectfully, I would like to disagree a bit with Mr. Simpson above. Pretty much like everyone else who uses self-steering of a sort, I have wondered about the effects of the drag of a servo blade. I am using an older Hasler SP unit (one of the very first servo-blade units made) so it is a relevant issue to me. So, to sort it out I ran the numbers of my boat and blade through the drag equation (F = 0.5 C ρ A V2) . My blade extends about 2 feet under water, has a chord of 6", and is a NACA 0010 section. Plugging in the constants etc. the results indicate that at 4 knots the force needed to propel the blade through the water is .67 lbs., and at 6 knots it rises to 1.48 lbs. Using the SailPowerCalc website I found that the force generated by my rig (main and 120%) at 9 kn of wind (about my 4 kn range) while beating is 240 lbs of forward drive. So the .67 lbs. of drag represents about .3% of the force driving the boat forward. A .3% reduction of speed represents a loss of .012 kn, not .1 kn. Downwind the drive forces will be much larger due to the force vectors for the sails aligning more directly with the boats heading and making the loss of drive and even smaller percentage. At 6 knots (12 knots or so with a 100%) the drive force increases to 426 lbs. and the servo drag remains at about .3% of the drive force. This results in a reduction of .018 kn. These numbers are squishy for certain, but likely they are accurate enough to get a reasonable picture of the magnitude of the forces at play.

    Are there compensatory advantages to a vane then that might compensate for the small speed loss when using the servo-blade to move the tiller/wheel? No argument that reaching and downwind/light air work require an electric autopilot for efficiency. My ST2000 drops from a 1.8 amp draw to a .5 amp draw when I change it form direct tiller drive to the servo-blade drive in moderate air. This saves over 24 amps per day and eliminates the need for a 40 watt solar panel, saving about 12 lbs. The weight of the fuel required to charge that 24 amps over the course of a Transpac would be a good deal more. The wear and tear on the autopilot is drastically reduced as it only needs to change the angle of the servo-blade (a finger tip operation), making it unnecessary to carry multiple spares as suggested by so many (one of last years entries went through three coming down from Washington). There is a lower probability of needing to deal with the possible problems associated with a steering failure (broaches, sail damage etc.). Upwind a vane is generally considered more efficient that a compass driven unit as it responds to every wind shift. And there is the safety factor to consider. If all the electronic devices fail, or if there is not enough sun to recharge, the boat will still quite happily sail in any direction you choose, although with a bit less efficiency (as has happened in the Transpac).

    I am not arguing that vanes are the best way to go, only that they represent a very real and competitive alternative to using electric autopilots exclusively. When the autopilot can be linked to the servo-blade for course correction in those conditions where a vane is less effective, a very flexible and efficient system is created. Further, the system has the additional advantage of providing a reliable alternative for steering the boat in the event of serious mishap (some designs can act as the emergency rudder as the General has demonstrated).

    One final note. My boat is small and lively and I had difficulty getting the vane to steer reasonably, especially on a reach or downwind. The vane would correct, the boat would over-steer, the vane would over correct the over-steer etc. By setting up the tiller lines with the option of 1, 2 or 3 part purchase (very easy to switch from one to the other) I was able to dampen the course correction down, slow the boats response time which allowed the vane to react in time with the boats change in heading. The result was much straighter tracking and far fewer 'S' turns. While not a par with the ST2000, it creates a track that is quite acceptable for coastal cruising and day sailing without any power drain.
    Last edited by sdpaine@cox.net; 02-22-2015 at 06:35 PM. Reason: grammer errors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •